Skip to main content

This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1363

reference
202-tree-1
name
1363
tree-preservation-order

undefined

202-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.026589 50.864868)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.026560 50.864864,-1.026562 50.864870,-1.026566 50.864875,-1.026580 50.864882,-1.026588 50.864883,-1.026597 50.864882,-1.026612 50.864875,-1.026616 50.864871,-1.026617 50.864865,-1.026616 50.864859,-1.026612 50.864854,-1.026606 50.864850,-1.026589 50.864847,-1.026572 50.864850,-1.026566 50.864854,-1.026560 50.864864)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL